BC.Game licence history: Small House, BlockDance and the Dutch order

Which companies appear in BC.Game’s licence records?

Two separate legal entities appear in the official records reviewed for the BC.Game brand: Small House B.V. in Curaçao licensing records, and BlockDance B.V. in a Dutch enforcement record. They appear in different records, from different regulators, at different dates, and the reviewed sources do not establish any corporate relationship between them, nor which entity operates the brand today.

Sources for the table rows: the CGA enforcement register dated 14 September 2026, the CGA historical certificate for Small House B.V. (bc.game), and the KSA conditional order against BlockDance B.V. dated 17 October 2024. All three were checked on 29 September 2026 and rechecked on 30 September 2026.

A domain appearing on a licence certificate or in an enforcement order is a source-scoped observation about that record. It is not a statement about who beneficially owns the brand, and a shared domain across two records is not proof of common ownership or control.

What happened to BC.Game’s Curaçao licence OGL/2023/118/0060?

Licence OGL/2023/118/0060, held by Small House B.V., is recorded as Revoked, with a revocation date of 6 December 2024, in the Curaçao Gaming Authority enforcement register dated 14 September 2026. The entry sits on page 2, row 32 of that register, and no expiry date is stated in the record.

Small House B.V. is listed with registration number 164979 and Curaçao as its registration jurisdiction. Both details come from regulator disclosure; we did not obtain an independent corporate-register extract, so the company data should be read as the regulator’s record rather than as a verified company filing.

The separate Curaçao Gaming Authority certificate record for Small House B.V. lists the domain bc.game and shows the certificate as revoked. By our own count of distinct hostnames in that certificate snapshot, one domain is listed: bc.game. A domain count is not a brand count, mirrors are included, and a snapshot is not a permanent inventory.

In plain terms, a revoked entry means the regulator’s record shows the authorisation ended on the stated date rather than lapsing at expiry. It says nothing about any other jurisdiction: the record does not establish that BC.Game holds no licence anywhere else, and a Curaçao licence was never in itself authorisation to serve customers in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom or any other country. Register entries and certificate pages are two different observations that can diverge, which is why we treat them as separate columns; the mechanics are set out in our guide to a Curaçao licence check: certificate versus register.

What did the Dutch KSA order against BlockDance B.V.?

The Kansspelautoriteit imposed a conditional penalty order on BlockDance B.V. on 17 October 2024, naming the domains bc.game and bcgame.lu, with a penalty rate of EUR 280,000 per week and a ceiling of EUR 840,000, and giving four weeks to stop offering games of chance to Dutch consumers.

A conditional penalty order is a compliance instrument: the money becomes payable only if the addressee fails to meet the order. The EUR 840,000 figure is therefore a cap on what could have become due, not a penalty that the reviewed records show was incurred or paid. Whether any amount accrued under the order is not established in the sources reviewed here, and the records do not connect the order to the September 2026 leak material.

BlockDance B.V.’s registration jurisdiction is recorded as not independently verified: the entity is named by the regulator, but we did not obtain a corporate extract confirming where it is incorporated.

Timeline of the dated BC.Game licence records

Each status above is a dated snapshot, not a guarantee of the position today; the same caution applies to the other brand-and-entity chains we track, such as the Santeda licences behind MyStake, Velobet and Goldenbet, and to the broader picture set out on our Casino Secrets exposure overview.

What these records do not settle — who operates bc.game now, and what the companies and journalists have said about it — is addressed next.

What does the Casino Secrets reporting say about BC.Game?

The September 2026 reporting places BC.Game among the brands directly discussed in the Casino Secrets / Curaçao Files material, without, in the sources reviewed here, resolving who operates the brand today. Casino Secrets reporting, published on 26 September 2026, names BC.Game as a brand appearing in the investigation into offshore gambling licensing and the Curaçao regulator. That is a reporting observation, not a regulatory finding, and it is separate from the two official records covered in part 1.

The official records stand on their own footing. The Curaçao Gaming Authority’s enforcement register dated 14 September 2026 records licence OGL/2023/118/0060, held by Small House B.V., as revoked, with a revocation date of 6 December 2024 (CGA enforcement register). The Netherlands gambling regulator Kansspelautoriteit (KSA) imposed a conditional penalty order on BlockDance B.V. on 17 October 2024 covering bc.game and bcgame.lu, set at EUR 280,000 per week and capped at EUR 840,000, with four weeks to cease offering (KSA conditional order: BlockDance).

Neither record, on its own terms, is linked by the regulators to the leaked material: the enforcement register entry and the KSA order both predate the September 2026 reporting, and no link to the leak is established in the sources reviewed. No published response from Small House B.V., BlockDance B.V. or the BC.Game brand is included in the records and reporting reviewed for this page.

Who operates BC.Game now, and what do the records not establish?

The reviewed records do not establish which company operates BC.Game as of the 30 September 2026 recheck. Small House B.V. (registration 164979, disclosed by the regulator as Curaçao) appears on a historical Curaçao certificate for bc.game that is tied to the revoked licence (CGA historical certificate). BlockDance B.V. appears as the addressee of the Dutch order; its registration jurisdiction is not independently verified in the reviewed records.

These are two separate historical records, not one verified chain of succession. Appearing in records that name the same domain is not proof of common ownership or control, and the Curaçao revocation does not establish that BC.Game holds no licence in any other jurisdiction. Equally, a licence or certificate in Curaçao was never an authorisation to serve customers in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom or anywhere else.

Claim versus evidence: what is confirmed and what is not

What is still unresolved about the BC.Game licence record?

• Which company operates bc.game today, and under which licence or licences, is not established in the reviewed records.
• Whether any penalty accrued or was collected under the KSA order of 17 October 2024 is not stated in the reviewed records; the EUR 840,000 figure is a ceiling on a conditional penalty, not a paid fine.
• BlockDance B.V.’s registration jurisdiction is not independently verified.
• Any relationship between Small House B.V. and BlockDance B.V. beyond their separate appearances in the two records is not established.
• Whether the Curaçao revocation of 6 December 2024 is connected to the matters described in the September 2026 reporting is not established.

Why the BC.Game licence records matter

For people in the United Kingdom checking a casino, the practical point is that a brand’s licence footprint can change while the site and domain stay the same. A revoked Curaçao licence, a historical certificate and a Dutch enforcement order are three different observations, each with its own date, and none of them describes the brand’s authorisation to accept customers in Britain. Anyone concerned about their own gambling can contact a gambling support service in their country.

For industry and compliance readers, the BC.Game record is a worked example of why operator due diligence should be entity-led rather than brand-led: the name on a certificate, the name on an enforcement order and the name behind a domain today may differ, and register status and certificate status must be logged separately. Our explainer on certificate versus register discrepancies in Curaçao sets out how the two views diverge.

For regulators and journalists, the useful detail is the locator trail: a dated register row, a certificate keyed to a domain, and a national enforcement decision with a stated weekly amount and cap. That combination allows independent verification without relying on leaked material, and it mirrors the pattern documented for other brand groups, such as the Santeda licences and the Swedish ban. The wider brand and country picture is summarised on the Casino Secrets overview.

How to check these records yourself

1. Open the CGA enforcement register dated 14 September 2026 and locate the row for OGL/2023/118/0060 and Small House B.V.; note the status and the revocation date, plus the register’s own date.
2. Open the CGA historical certificate for Small House B.V. and record the domain shown and the certificate state; keep it as a separate line from the register status.
3. Open the KSA order against BlockDance B.V. and confirm the date, the weekly amount, the cap, the compliance window and the domains named.
4. Check whether the Dutch regulator has published any later decision, withdrawal or collection notice relating to that order before treating the cap as an amount owed.
5. Read the Casino Secrets reporting of 26 September 2026 to see how the brand is characterised in journalism, and keep that separate from the regulator records.
6. Record the date of each check. A dated snapshot describes the record on that day only, not the position today.

How we checked this

• We reviewed official Curaçao Gaming Authority (CGA) records for BC.Game-linked entities, including the enforcement register dated 14 September 2026 and a historical CGA certificate for Small House B.V.
• We reviewed the Dutch Kansspelautoriteit (KSA, the Netherlands’ gambling regulator) conditional penalty order of 17 October 2024 concerning BlockDance B.V.
• We reviewed published reporting from the September 2026 Casino Secrets / Curaçao Files coverage that names BC.Game.
• Our research cut-off for this page is 29 September 2026, and licence records were rechecked on 30 September 2026.
• We did not access, host or quote leaked documents, did not name or describe individual owners, directors or employees, and did not obtain independent corporate-registry extracts beyond what the regulator sources themselves disclose.

Limits

• The records reviewed are historical: Small House B.V.’s Curaçao licence (OGL/2023/118/0060) and BlockDance B.V.’s Dutch order are each tied to a specific date, and neither source establishes who operates bc.game today or under which current licence.
• BlockDance B.V.’s registration jurisdiction was not independently verified; it is disclosed only by the KSA order, without a corresponding corporate-register extract.
• The EUR 840,000 figure in the KSA order is a cap on a conditional penalty, not confirmation that any sum was paid or accrued.
• Small House B.V. and BlockDance B.V. appear in separate historical records and are not merged here into a single confirmed current operator of BC.Game.

Sources

• CGA enforcement register - official record, dated 14 September 2026; lists the revocation status of OGL/2023/118/0060.
• CGA historical certificate: Small House B.V. (bc.game) - official record, date not stated on the certificate itself.
• KSA conditional order: BlockDance - official record, dated 17 October 2024; sets out the conditional penalty for bc.game and bcgame.lu.
• Casino Secrets reporting: BC.Game and Santeda - published reporting, dated 26 September 2026.

Corrections and right of reply

Companies named on this page may send a correction request or a response, and any published reply will be added next to the relevant claim in the section it concerns. This page is updated when the underlying regulator records or published reporting change.

Curaçao Leak is not affiliated with the Casino Secrets / Curaçao Files project, its journalists or media partners, the Curaçao Gaming Authority, or any company named on this site.