Research Desk
Abstract dark-teal editorial hero image with glowing network nodes and deep navy tones for offshore gambling licence research

Records checked: 30 September 2026

Platincasino licence: Curaçao records versus the German criminal case

Latiform B.V. holds Curaçao licence OGL/2024/163/0190, marked Indefinite in the CGA register dated 21 September 2026; published reporting links the Platincasino brand to a German criminal case citing €5.86bn in stakes.

TL;DR

platincasino.com is listed on Curaçao licence OGL/2024/163/0190, held by Latiform B.V., while a separate German criminal case alleges €5.86bn in stakes and €77.6m in unpaid tax linked to the brand by reporting, with no charge filed as of the report date.

  • Latiform B.V. (registration 160604, Curaçao) holds licence OGL/2024/163/0190 under the Curaçao Gaming Authority, listed as a B2C authorisation (CGA licence register, 21 Sep 2026).
  • The register shows the licence status as “Indefinite” (CGA register, 21 Sep 2026); the certificate separately shows “Active”, grant date 16 Jul 2024 (CGA certificate, checked 29 Sep 2026).
  • German case reporting cites €5.86bn in stakes (Jul 2021–Dec 2023), €82m in assets reportedly secured, and €77.6m in alleged unpaid tax for 2024, with 11 properties searched (published reporting).
  • Three published annual tax-model estimates for Latiform B.V. sum to €227,757,221.72, leaving a €22,242,778.28 gap against the reported approximately €250m narrative figure (our arithmetic).
  • The German case’s brand link to Platincasino is supplied by reporting, not an official finding, and the defence has rejected the allegations.
  • Still unresolved: whether German charges will be filed and what the true German revenue share behind the tax model actually is.

Who holds the licence behind Platincasino?

The Curaçao licence associated with platincasino.com is held by Latiform B.V., registration number 160604, under licence OGL/2024/163/0190 issued by the Curaçao Gaming Authority (CGA, the island’s gaming regulator). That is what the regulator’s own two records show: the CGA online gaming licence register dated 21 September 2026, and the CGA licence certificate for Latiform B.V., both checked by this desk on 29 September 2026 and rechecked on 30 September 2026.

The two records are separate observations and we keep them separate. The register is a dated PDF snapshot published by the regulator; the certificate is a live token page that displays a status and a list of approved domains. They can disagree, and where they do we report both rather than reconciling them into a single “licence status”. Our companion explainer on how the Curaçao certificate and register differ sets out why that distinction matters.

DomainLegal entityRegistration no.Licence and regulatorRegister status (record dated 21 Sep 2026)Certificate status (checked 29 Sep 2026)
platincasino.comLatiform B.V.160604 (Curaçao)OGL/2024/163/0190 · Curaçao Gaming Authority · B2CIndefinite; issued 24 December 2025; expiry not stated; p20, row 577Active; certificate grant date 16 July 2024
platinumslots.comLatiform B.V.160604 (Curaçao)OGL/2024/163/0190 · Curaçao Gaming Authority · B2CIndefinite; issued 24 December 2025; expiry not stated; p20, row 577Active; certificate grant date 16 July 2024

Three points of plain interpretation. “Indefinite” in the register’s status column is the regulator’s own wording for that row; it records that no expiry date is stated, not that the licence has been guaranteed in perpetuity. The register entry is dated 21 September 2026 and describes that day only — a dated snapshot is not evidence of the position today. And the registration number 160604 comes from regulator disclosure; this desk has not obtained an independent Curaçao corporate-registry extract for Latiform B.V., so the company details are regulator-sourced rather than independently confirmed.

The register row shows an issue date of 24 December 2025 while the certificate shows a grant date of 16 July 2024. We record both as they appear and do not attempt to explain the difference.

One further note for readers comparing sources: some older casino review pages list a different operating company and a different licensing authority for Platincasino. We do not assess those pages here. What we can state is that the CGA certificate checked on 29 September 2026 lists Latiform B.V. as the holder and platincasino.com among its approved domains.

Finally, an approved domain on a Curaçao certificate is a licensing fact in Curaçao. It is not an authorisation to serve customers in any other country, and it is not a statement about who ultimately owns or controls the brand.

Which domains are listed on the Latiform B.V. certificate?

The CGA certificate for Latiform B.V. lists nine distinct domains, falling into two obvious name families: five Platinumslots domains and four Platincasino domains. That count is our own arithmetic — distinct lowercase hostnames on the certificate snapshot checked on 29 September 2026 — not a figure published by the regulator.

Name familyDomains listed on the certificateCount
Platincasinoplatincasino.com, platincasino.io, platincasino1.com, platincasino2.com4
Platinumslotsplatinumslots.com, platinumslots2.com, platinumslots3.com, platinumslots4.com, platinumslots5.com5
Total distinct domains—9

A domain count is not a brand count. Numbered variants are commonly mirrors of the same site, and grouping them into “name families” is our editorial grouping for readability, not an ownership or corporate finding. For scale, our cross-check of another CGA certificate found that Just Entertainment B.V. lists 362 distinct domains, many of them mirrors — which is exactly why we publish the counting method alongside the number and never translate domains into “casinos”.

Platinumslots appears on the same certificate as Platincasino. Being listed alongside another brand on a licence certificate is not an allegation against it: the published reporting treats Platinumslots as operator and network context and does not accuse it separately. Latiform B.V. also appears within the SOFTSWISS-associated grouping described by the investigation’s reporting, which we cover in more detail in our page on SOFTSWISS-linked companies in the Curaçao files. Shared software, a shared supplier or a shared certificate is not proof of common ownership or control.

What is the German criminal case about, and what do its figures measure?

The German criminal case is an investigation into allegedly illegal online gambling in which regional reporting describes €5.86bn in stakes between July 2021 and December 2023, roughly €82m in assets reportedly secured, an alleged €77.6m in unpaid tax for 2024, and 11 properties searched on 8 September 2026. The link between this case and the Platincasino brand is supplied by published reporting, not by the enforcement bodies’ own public statements, and we attribute it accordingly.

FigureValue and unitPeriodWhat it measuresWhat it is notSource and type
Stakes in the caseEUR 5,860,000,000July 2021 – December 2023Case-scale amount wagered, GermanyNot revenue, not player losses, not a fine, not a Platincasino-only figureGGL statement on the enforcement operation (official record, 17 Sep 2026); brand link from Amphora Media (reporting, 24 Sep 2026)
Assets reportedly securedEUR 82,000,000Reported as at 8 September 2026Assets provisionally secured in a criminal investigationNot a final confiscation, not a fine, not a convictiontagesschau/hr regional reporting (reporting, 9 Sep 2026)
Alleged unpaid taxEUR 77,600,0002024Amount alleged by investigators in the criminal caseNot an assessed liability, not proven, and separate from the journalistic tax model belowtagesschau/hr regional reporting (reporting, 9 Sep 2026)
Properties searched118 September 2026Case-scale enforcement activityNot a finding of wrongdoing at any addresstagesschau/hr regional reporting (reporting, 9 Sep 2026)

Two cautions apply to the whole table. Searches, secured assets and alleged tax amounts belong to an investigation; they are not charges, not a conviction and not a final penalty. And the enforcement action of 8 September 2026 predates the public launch of the Casino Secrets reporting, so no causal connection between the leak and the case is established — readers should not infer one.

We also do not add these figures together or to the estimates in the next section. Stakes, secured assets and alleged tax are three different measures, and combining them would produce a meaningless number.

What do the published revenue and tax-model figures say?

The Casino Secrets article publishes gross gaming revenue figures for Latiform B.V. of EUR 121,000,869 for 2024 and EUR 115,147,655 for 2025, three annual German tax estimates, and an approximate narrative figure of around EUR 250m — and the three annual estimates do not add up to that narrative figure.

ItemValue (EUR)PeriodMeasure type and basis
GGR, Latiform B.V.121,000,8692024Published gross gaming revenue; geographic split not independently verified
GGR, Latiform B.V.115,147,6552025Published gross gaming revenue; not stakes
Rounded revenue, Latiform B.V.131,000,0002025Published rounded revenue across multiple markets; revenue differs from GGR
Estimated German tax14,987,401.592023Journalist model estimate, not an assessment
Estimated German tax109,021,782.972024Journalist model estimate, not an assessment
Estimated German tax103,748,037.162025Journalist model estimate, not an assessment
Our sum of the three estimates227,757,221.722023–2025Our arithmetic on the three published annual estimates
Narrative approximate figure~250,000,0002023–2025 narrativePublished approximate claim in the same article
Gap22,242,778.282023–2025Our arithmetic: narrative figure minus our sum of the annual estimates

The GGR and revenue figures, the three annual estimates and the approximate EUR 250m narrative figure all come from the Casino Secrets article on Platincasino (published 22 September 2026), with the rounded 2025 revenue figure from the Casino Secrets article on SOFTSWISS (22 September 2026). The sum of EUR 227,757,221.72 and the EUR 22,242,778.28 gap are our own arithmetic on those published inputs; the calculation does not validate the modelling behind them.

For that reason we do not present “EUR 250m in unpaid tax” as an established amount. It is the article’s approximate narrative figure, and it does not reconcile with the article’s own three annual estimates.

The tax model also rests on an assumption that 85% of the relevant revenue is German. That share is a modelling assumption stated in the reporting, not an audited breakdown of customer countries, and a different share would move every estimate in the table. Gross gaming revenue is also not the same measure as the case-scale stakes figure above, and the two must not be compared.

The broader pattern of which operators and markets the leak touches is set out on our overview of the Casino Secrets leak.

What the records establish ends here; what the investigation alleges, and what the defence has said in response, is set out next.

What does the reporting allege about Platincasino, and what has been said in response?

The reporting places Platincasino inside a German criminal investigation, while the brand-to-case link is supplied by journalism rather than by any published official record naming the brand. The Casino Secrets article on Platincasino, published on 22 September 2026, discusses the brand directly (Casino Secrets: Platincasino). Amphora Media, on 24 September 2026, is the source that connects the German case to Platincasino (Reporting links German case to Platincasino). Readers should keep that distinction in mind: the case figures come from the German regulator and regional reporting, the brand attribution comes from the press.

On the enforcement side, the Gemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder (GGL, Germany’s joint gambling regulator of the federal states) published a statement on the operation on 17 September 2026, and the stakes figure of EUR 5.86bn for the period July 2021 to December 2023 appears in that regulator material and in the linked reporting (GGL on German enforcement operation). Stakes are amounts wagered; they are not revenue, not player losses and not a penalty. Reporting dated 9 September 2026 states that assets of EUR 82m were reportedly secured on 8 September 2026 and that 11 properties were searched, with alleged unpaid tax of EUR 77.6m for 2024 (German investigation: stakes and assets secured). A reported seizure is a provisional step in a criminal investigation, not a confiscation order, a fine or a conviction.

The published response sits with the same reporting. As of the Amphora Media report dated 24 September 2026, the defence rejects the allegations and the report states that no charge had been filed at the time of publication. That is reporting from September 2026, not a live court-status check by this desk.

Separately, the Casino Secrets article sets out a tax model for Latiform B.V.: published GGR of EUR 121,000,869 for 2024 and EUR 115,147,655 for 2025, annual German tax estimates for 2023, 2024 and 2025, and an assumed German share of 85%. The 85% figure is a modelling assumption, not an audited customer-country mix, and the annual amounts are journalistic estimates rather than assessments by any tax authority. Our own arithmetic on the three published annual estimates gives EUR 227,757,221.72, which is EUR 22,242,778.28 below the approximately EUR 250m narrative figure used in the same article. We publish the gap rather than resolve it; whether the narrative figure includes other amounts is not established. A rounded revenue figure of EUR 131m for 2025 for Latiform B.V. appears in the related Casino Secrets: SOFTSWISS article, where Latiform B.V. is part of the reported SOFTSWISS-associated grouping; our summary of that grouping is on the page covering SOFTSWISS-linked companies in the Curaçao files. Revenue and GGR are different measures and must not be added together or to the criminal-case figures.

Platinumslots appears on the same Curaçao certificate as a sibling name family. Inclusion on a certificate is not an accusation, and the reviewed sources do not level a separate brand-specific allegation against Platinumslots.

Claim versus evidence for Platincasino and Latiform B.V.

ClaimWho says itEvidence typeStatus as of 29 September 2026
Latiform B.V. (registration 160604) holds licence OGL/2024/163/0190Curaçao Gaming Authority register dated 21 September 2026 and certificateOfficial recordConfirmed record
platincasino.com is an approved domain on the Latiform B.V. certificateCGA certificate, checked 29 September 2026Official recordConfirmed record (snapshot, not ownership)
Stakes of EUR 5.86bn, July 2021 to December 2023, in the German caseGGL statement, 17 September 2026, and linked reportingOfficial record plus reported linkReported at case scale; brand link from reporting
EUR 82m in assets reportedly secured on 8 September 2026Regional reporting, 9 September 2026Published reportingReported; not a confiscation or fine
Alleged unpaid tax of EUR 77.6m for 2024Regional reporting, 9 September 2026Published reportingAllegation; not decided
11 properties searched on 8 September 2026Regional reporting, 9 September 2026Published reportingReported
Approximately EUR 250m German tax, 2023–2025 narrativeCasino Secrets, 22 September 2026Published reporting (estimate)Unreconciled with its own annual table
Three annual estimates total EUR 227,757,221.72; gap EUR 22,242,778.28Curaçao Leak Research DeskOur arithmetic on published figuresUnresolved discrepancy
Defence rejects the allegations; no charge filed at publicationAmphora Media, 24 September 2026Published reporting (response)Reported response

What is still unresolved about the Platincasino licence and the German case?

  • Whether charges will be filed in the German criminal case. The 24 September 2026 report states none had been filed at that point.
  • The actual German share of Latiform B.V.’s revenue. The 85% used in the published tax model is an assumption.
  • Whether the approximately EUR 250m narrative figure includes amounts beyond the three annual estimates; the EUR 22,242,778.28 difference is unexplained in the reviewed source.
  • No independent corporate-registry extract for Latiform B.V. was obtained; the registration number 160604 and Curaçao registration come from regulator disclosure.
  • Why the register entry dated 21 September 2026 and the certificate display show different status wording and dates. We record both rather than merging them, as explained on our page about the Curaçao licence check: certificate versus register.

Why the Platincasino licence records matter

For people in the United Kingdom checking a casino, the practical point is jurisdictional: a Curaçao licence authorises activity under the Curaçao framework and is not an authorisation to serve customers in another country. Whether a brand may lawfully accept customers in a given market is a question for that market’s own regulator and its register, not for the Curaçao record. Anyone worried about their own gambling can contact a gambling support service in their country.

For affiliate, compliance and industry readers, the Platincasino records show why measure types must be kept apart. Case-scale stakes of EUR 5.86bn, EUR 82m reportedly secured, EUR 77.6m alleged unpaid tax for 2024 and a journalistic tax model built on GGR are four different things, produced by different processes, and none of them is a final penalty. A domain count of nine on the certificate is also not a count of nine brands; mirrors are included.

For regulators and journalists, the useful material is the reconciliation: a published narrative figure that does not match the published annual table from the same article, a model assumption of 85% German share that no reviewed source verifies, and a register-versus-certificate difference recorded on the same day. Those are checkable gaps rather than conclusions. Wider context on which operators and countries appear most often in the leak is on our Casino Secrets overview.

How to check Platincasino’s licence record yourself

  1. Open the CGA online gaming licence register dated 21 September 2026 and find the entry at page 20, row 577, for licence OGL/2024/163/0190.
  2. Open the CGA licence certificate for Latiform B.V. and read the approved domain list and the displayed certificate status.
  3. Compare the two: note the register status wording and record date separately from the certificate status and grant date, and record any difference rather than assuming one overrides the other.
  4. Read the German case material at source: the GGL statement of 17 September 2026 and the regional reporting of 9 September 2026, checking which figure belongs to which period and measure.
  5. Check the brand linkage and the defence position in the Amphora Media report of 24 September 2026, then re-add the three annual estimates in the Casino Secrets Platincasino article yourself to test the approximately EUR 250m figure.
  6. Finally, check the register of the gambling regulator in your own country for the brand you are looking at; the Curaçao record does not answer that question.

Case status above is taken from reporting dated September 2026 and licence records rechecked on 30 September 2026; a dated snapshot is not a guarantee of the current position.

FAQ: Platincasino licence and German case

  • Which company holds the Platincasino licence?

    Latiform B.V. is the licensee behind Platincasino, holding Curaçao Gaming Authority licence OGL/2024/163/0190 for B2C activity. The Curaçao Gaming Authority (CGA) online gaming licence register, dated 21 September 2026 and rechecked 29 September 2026, lists Latiform B.V. under registration number 160604 against this licence.

  • Is the Platincasino Curaçao licence currently active?

    There are two separate official records, not one merged status. The CGA register dated 21 September 2026 shows the licence status as “Indefinite”, while the CGA certificate (granted 16 July 2024, checked 29 September 2026) shows certificate status “Active”; the two are kept as distinct observations, not reconciled into a single verdict.

  • What domains are listed on Latiform B.V.'s CGA certificate?

    Nine domains appear on the certificate checked 29 September 2026, split into two name families: four Platincasino domains and five Platinumslots domains. This is a domain count, not a brand count, since mirrors are included, and the grouping into name families is this desk’s own classification of the certificate data.

  • Is Platinumslots also implicated in the German criminal case?

    No, Platinumslots is not separately accused. It appears alongside Platincasino as a sibling brand on the same Latiform B.V. certificate checked 29 September 2026, and its inclusion on that certificate is not, by itself, evidence of any allegation against it.

  • What is the German criminal case reportedly linked to Platincasino about?

    Amphora Media links a German criminal case to the Platincasino brand, citing stakes of EUR 5.86 billion for July 2021 to December 2023, assets reportedly secured of EUR 82 million on 8 September 2026, alleged unpaid tax of EUR 77.6 million for 2024, and 11 properties searched on 8 September 2026, according to reporting on the enforcement action.

  • Has anyone been convicted in the Platincasino-linked case?

    No conviction is established in the facts reviewed. Reporting dated 24 September 2026 states that the defence rejects the allegations and that no charge had been filed as of that publication date; a seizure of assets is a reported investigative step, not a finding of guilt.

  • Do the published German tax-model figures match the approximately €250 million headline?

    No, they do not reconcile. The three published annual estimates for 2023 to 2025 sum to EUR 227,757,221.72 by this desk’s arithmetic, which is EUR 22,242,778.28 short of the approximately EUR 250 million narrative figure used in the same Casino Secrets reporting dated 22 September 2026; the gap is unresolved.

  • Does the Curaçao licence authorise Platincasino to serve customers in Germany?

    No, an offshore Curaçao licence is not an authorisation to serve customers in any other specific country, including Germany. Whether Platincasino separately holds a German authorisation is not established in the records reviewed; readers can check licence and certificate wording themselves via the Curaçao licence check guide.

How we checked this

  • We checked the Curaçao Gaming Authority (CGA) online gaming licence register dated 21 September 2026 and the corresponding CGA licence certificate for Latiform B.V., cross-referencing register status against certificate status rather than merging the two.
  • We reviewed the German enforcement statement issued by the GGL (Gemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder, Germany’s joint gambling authority) on the September 2026 operation, alongside regional and specialist reporting on the linked criminal case.
  • We compared the published tax-model figures and revenue figures attributed to Latiform B.V. against each other, showing our own arithmetic separately from the reported figures.
  • Research cut-off for this page is 29 September 2026; licence records were rechecked on 30 September 2026.
  • We did not access, host or reproduce any leaked documents; we did not attempt to identify or describe any individual owner, director or employee; and we did not obtain an independent corporate-registry extract for Latiform B.V. beyond what the regulator’s own disclosures show.

Limits

  • No independent corporate-registry extract for Latiform B.V. was obtained; registration details rely on regulator disclosure only.
  • The German criminal case status is taken from reporting dated September 2026 and is not the result of a live court check.
  • The German share of Latiform B.V.’s revenue used in the tax model is a published assumption, not an audited customer-country mix.
  • Whether the approximately €250 million narrative figure includes amounts beyond the three annual tax-model estimates is not established in the sources reviewed.

Sources

Corrections and right of reply

Companies named on this page may send a correction or a response, and any published reply is added next to the relevant claim rather than in a separate notice. This page is updated when the underlying registers, certificates or reporting change, and the checked dates above reflect the last verification.

Curaçao Leak is not affiliated with the Casino Secrets / Curaçao Files project, its journalists or media partners, the Curaçao Gaming Authority, or any company named on this site.

Explore This Page With AI

CL

Curaçao Leak Research Desk

Independent research desk

We cross-check public regulator records and published reporting about the September 2026 Casino Secrets / Curaçao Files investigation into offshore gambling licensing. Our research was completed and records were rechecked on 30 September 2026. We are not affiliated with the Casino Secrets / Curaçao Files project, its journalists or media partners, the Curaçao Gaming Authority, or any company named on the site.