Where can a Curaçao gaming licence be checked? Two official sources, not one
A Curaçao gaming licence check has two separate official displays, and they are not the same record. The first is the certificate lookup on the regulator’s certificate domain (cert.cga.cw), usually reached from a seal or licence link in a casino site’s footer; it shows a licence number, the licence-holding company, a grant date, a status and a list of approved domains. The second is the Curaçao Gaming Authority (CGA) online gaming licence register, published as a dated PDF, which lists licence numbers with a holder, an issue date, an expiry field and a status line.
The two are different observations of the same licence number and are treated that way throughout this page. Our own check of both sources on 29 September 2026 used the CGA online gaming licence register dated 21 September 2026 and the individual certificate pages listed below. A third record, the CGA enforcement register dated 14 September 2026, lists licences with enforcement outcomes such as revocation.
One practical starting point is the operator’s own licence disclosure. On our check of 29 September 2026, the Stake.com licence page names Medium Rare N.V. and licence OGL/2024/1451/0918, which matches the identity shown on the corresponding CGA certificate — a match of identity, not a verification of status.
Where do the certificate and the register disagree? Worked examples with licence numbers
For two of the five licences checked, the CGA certificate showed “Active” while the CGA register dated 21 September 2026 showed “Assessment in progress” for the same licence number. This is a documented conflict between two official displays, and we do not treat either one as the corrected version; reconciling them requires clarification from the regulator.
| Example domain on certificate | Licence holder | Curaçao registration no. | Licence no. (CGA), type | Register status, register dated 21 September 2026 | Certificate status, checked 29 September 2026 |
|---|
| stake.com | Medium Rare N.V. | 145353 | OGL/2024/1451/0918, B2C | Assessment in progress; issued 9 December 2025; expiry field 9 June 2026 (p7, row 193) | Active; certificate grant date 9 June 2025 |
| goldenbet.com, velobet.com | Santeda International B.V. | 151296 | OGL/2024/1798/1048, B2C | Assessment in progress; issued 24 June 2025; expiry field 24 December 2025 (p19, row 550) | Active; certificate grant date 14 August 2024 |
| blaze.com, blaze.bet.br | Prolific Trade N.V. | 150731 | OGL/2024/1415/0636, B2C | Indefinite; issued 24 December 2025; expiry not stated (p15, row 422) | Active; certificate grant date 4 December 2024 |
| 1xbet.com | Caecus N.V. | 163779 | OGL/2024/1262/0493, B2C | Indefinite; issued 24 December 2025; expiry not stated (p16, row 457) | Active; certificate grant date 7 November 2024 |
| platincasino.com, platinumslots.com | Latiform B.V. | 160604 | OGL/2024/163/0190, B2C | Indefinite; issued 24 December 2025; expiry not stated (p20, row 577) | Active; certificate grant date 16 July 2024 |
| bc.game | Small House B.V. | 164979 | OGL/2023/118/0060, B2C | Revoked in the enforcement register dated 14 September 2026; revocation 6 December 2024 (p2, row 32) | Historical certificate only; current certificate status not established |
All register statuses, issue dates, expiry fields and page-and-row locators in the table above come from the CGA register dated 21 September 2026, except the Small House B.V. row, which comes from the CGA enforcement register dated 14 September 2026. All certificate statuses and grant dates come from the individual CGA certificate pages linked in the table, as observed on 29 September 2026.
Two of these rows are our own cross-checks rather than a single-document reading. For OGL/2024/1451/0918, the Medium Rare N.V. certificate showed “Active” while the 21 September 2026 register showed “Assessment in progress” with an expiry field of 9 June 2026. For OGL/2024/1798/1048, the Santeda International B.V. certificate showed “Active” while the same register showed “Assessment in progress” with an expiry field of 24 December 2025. We publish both observations and hold any categorical statement that the licence “is” or “is not” valid on those dates. Further licence detail for the Stake brand is set out on our page on who operates Stake across Curaçao, Brazil and Great Britain.
What do “Indefinite”, “Assessment in progress” and “Revoked” mean in the Curaçao records?
These are the register’s own status words, and we retain them rather than translating them into a verdict. In plain terms, and without going beyond the records:
- Assessment in progress is the status line the register shows for a licence entry that the regulator records as being under assessment on the register date. It appears in the 21 September 2026 register for OGL/2024/1451/0918 (Medium Rare N.V.) and OGL/2024/1798/1048 (Santeda International B.V.), in both cases alongside an expiry field earlier than the register date. What it implies for the licence’s operative effect is not established in the record.
- Indefinite is what the register shows in place of a stated expiry date for OGL/2024/1415/0636 (Prolific Trade N.V.), OGL/2024/1262/0493 (Caecus N.V.) and OGL/2024/163/0190 (Latiform B.V.), each issued 24 December 2025 with no expiry stated. The wording is the register’s; it is not a target-market authorisation for any country.
- Revoked appears in the enforcement register, not the licence register. OGL/2023/118/0060, held by Small House B.V. and associated with the historical bc.game certificate, is recorded as revoked with a revocation date of 6 December 2024. A revocation of one licence does not establish which entity operates a brand today, and does not speak to other jurisdictions; the sequence is set out on our page on the BC.Game licence history.
All three statuses are dated snapshots. A status read in a register dated 21 September 2026, or on a certificate checked 29 September 2026, is evidence about those dates only. The CGA’s own follow-up statement dated 22 September 2026 acknowledges unauthorised access to its online gaming portal and says the extent and number of files affected was not established, which is a further reason to record the date of every reading.
Can the operator and domain list behind a licence change? MyStake and the 2024 Swedish decision
Yes — the domain list attached to a licence is a snapshot, and historical records can name domains that a current certificate does not. The Swedish prohibition decision of 11 June 2024 issued against Santeda International B.V. names five domains, including mystake.com, and imposed an immediate prohibition; the absence of a Swedish licence is the jurisdiction-specific issue in that decision. The Santeda International B.V. certificate we checked on 29 September 2026 lists 13 domains and does not include mystake.com. On that basis we publish only the historical relationship recorded in the Swedish decision, pending independent resolution of the current operator; the Santeda licences and the Swedish ban are covered on our page on MyStake, Velobet and Goldenbet.
| Entity | Source snapshot | Distinct domains counted | Named examples |
|---|
| Medium Rare N.V. | CGA certificate, checked 29 September 2026 | 1 | stake.com |
| Prolific Trade N.V. | CGA certificate, checked 29 September 2026 | 3 | blaze.com, blaze.bet.br, blaze1.space |
| Caecus N.V. | CGA certificate, checked 29 September 2026 | 15 | 1xbet.com, 1xcasino.com, 1x-bet.com |
| Santeda International B.V. | CGA certificate, checked 29 September 2026 | 13 | goldenbet.com, velobet.com, rolletto.com, cosmobet.com |
| Santeda International B.V. | Swedish prohibition, 11 June 2024 | 5 | mystake.com, velobet.com, goldenbet.com, rolletto.com, cosmobet.com |
| Latiform B.V. | CGA certificate, checked 29 September 2026 | 9 | platincasino.com, platinumslots.com |
The counts above are our arithmetic on the domain strings shown in each source snapshot, counting distinct lowercase hostnames. A domain count is not a brand count: mirrors are included, and the Just Entertainment B.V. certificate we checked on 29 September 2026 lists 362 distinct domains, many of them mirrors, which is why we never restate such a figure as a number of casinos. Counts are also retrieval-specific — for Caecus N.V., a search-engine extraction showed additional mirror entries while the timestamped direct response contained 15 distinct domains, and the direct snapshot is the one counted here. A shared licence, certificate or domain family is not proof of common ownership or control. Anyone worried about their own gambling can contact a gambling support service in their own country.
What published reporting and the named companies say about these same licences, brands and figures is set out next.